His home was a dense area of rainforest and he lived on the wild coconuts that grew in abundance. His principal enemy was the army of mosquitoes that arrived with each new shower of rain. But for Hiroo Onoda there was another enemy - one that remained elusive. Unaware that the Second World War had ended 29 years earlier, he was still fighting a lonely guerrilla war in the jungles of Lubang Island in the Philippines. His story is one of courage, farce and loyalty gone mad.

A ship foundering beneath you was hardly “routine” in that regular tea-and-toast sense: it was an unusual matter of life and death. But a well-instilled concept of duty told the captain how he must behave as the seafarer with ultimate responsibility for the ship and her crew: he must, if it could at all be managed, be the last man off. And so, while his prolonged stay on the Coventry didn’t alter the number of casualties, it had perhaps done something else. Quite possibly – I don’t know – it made everyone who witnessed it feel better both about themselves and the Royal Navy, the historic institution to which they belonged. More certainly, though Hart Dyke doesn’t say so, it prevented many years of anguished reflection on his part over how he might have conducted himself differently at that moment.

How much more enviable he is than the Costa Concordia’s wretched captain, Francesco Schettino, even without taking into account Hart Dyke’s likely satisfaction at the popular success of his daughter, the actor and comedian Miranda Hart. But then – the post-religious, post-heroic thought – how much less enviable he would be to us, the living, if he were dead, if his concept of duty had killed him.

Several survivors from the Costa Concordia said that the disaster had been “just like a film”, implying that it had reminded them of typical scenes in Titanic movies when the sea flows down corridors, chairs in the dining saloon float away, and what had been luxury (a cigar box, say) turns into a kind of naivety. Of course, to compare the two disasters is absurd: there are so many major differences. This week a minor one got the most play. While Schettino took prematurely to a lifeboat, Captain EJ Smith stayed aboard and went down with the ship.

The inscription below Smith’s memorial statue in Lichfield, his birthplace, says he bequeathed “to his countrymen the memory and example of a great heart, a brave life and a heroic death”, and carries a simple instruction: “Be British.” Many of these words can be contested. We simply can’t know how heroically Smith faced death, or even if he lived his life with anything more than a seaman’s ordinary fortitude. George Bernard Shaw, writing a month after the Titanic sank, wondered about the “effects of a sensational catastrophe on a modern nation”. Rather than weeping, prayer or sympathy for the bereaved, the result was “an explosion of outrageous romantic lying”. The typical British shipwreck, Shaw wrote, had three “romantic demands” in particular: that the cry “Women and children first” should be heard, that all men aboard (“except the foreigners”) should be heroes, and the captain a superhero, and that “everybody should face death without a tremor”.

Shaw traced the origins of these expectations to the wreck of the Birkenhead, a troopship (and one of the Royal Navy’s earliest steamships) that had hit a rock and foundered off the coast of South Africa in 1852.

While the few women and children on board were being loaded into the boats, the troops held ranks at attention on deck, even though the ship was breaking up beneath them. Hundreds died, including all the senior naval officers. A story of self-sacrifice and stoicism set a pattern for behaviour in Britain’s merchant and military navies that enhanced, and sometimes confused, a captain’s traditional responsibilities for the welfare of his ship and crew. The “Birkenhead drill” meant a seafarer stared death in the eye while the weaker sex was rowed to safety. In the 18th century, a captain could be both a patriarch and a tyrant, a drinker and flogger. Now, as he took his seat among his passengers at that new Victorian social arrangement, the captain’s table, he became a kindlier and nobler father figure. Still a patriarch, but one who would place your needs and life above his own even to the ultimate sacrifice; or so the story went.

Chivalry at sea became an essential British ideal, and proof of the superiority of Anglo-Saxons (a category that included North Americans and most northern Europeans) over more panicky peoples from the south and east. The annals of old shipwrecks are filled with implications of their alleged poor behaviour. “I saw a lot of Latin people all along the ship’s rails,” recalled the Titanic’s fifth officer, Harold Lowe. “They were glaring more or less like wild beasts, ready to spring.” No Birkenhead drill for him: Lowe was sitting in a lifeboat at the time, being lowered past the still-crowded upper decks, but the awkwardness of his position as an officer leaving his passengers behind to drown seems never to have occurred to him. “Latins” weren’t to be trusted in an emergency, and therefore didn’t count.

The spectre now haunting Italy is that this label has stuck. “We’ve gone straight into the Titanic nightmare [and] Italy is once again the laughing stock of foreign newspapers,” wrote a blogger, Caterina Soffici, this week. In Il Giornale, the columnist Cristiano Gatti wrote that the rest of the world would be delighted to rediscover “the same old rascally Italians: those unreliable cowards who turn and run in war and flee like rabbits from the ship, even if they are in command”. But are either of these statements really true? People who know about ships and seafaring in Britain take pity on Schettino, rather than laugh at him. They puzzle over the course he took that led to the collision with the reef, they wonder how many people were on the bridge with him at the time, and why nobody raised a warning. Perhaps they snigger a little at his account of tripping and falling into a lifeboat (“How odd that his first officer seems to have done the same thing”), but on the whole they understand the torrent of guilt and self-recrimination that must threaten to overwhelm him, first for losing a ship and so many lives and, second, for his subsequent behaviour. None, at least of those I talked to, went as far as Professor Craig Allen of the US Coastguard Academy and accused him of “abject cowardice”.

But his transgression is enormous. The rule that a captain must be the last man (or woman) to leave a ship in difficulties is never written down, but everywhere understood. In the words of a former P&O captain: “At sea, you have a great sense of responsibility for the people who are beneath you – it’s moral as well as legal. You need to stay as long as anyone else remains.”

In this altruistic sense, the mystique of captaincy has survived into its third century. Sentiment, if not always practicality, will ensure it continues. For who can resist the gallantry of David Hart Dyke staying aboard the tilting hull of HMS Coventry, or Noel Coward and what remains of his crew clinging to their life-raft in In Which We Serve, and Coward commanding, as his destroyer finally goes down: “Three cheers for the ship!”